Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) I. Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. Email: [email protected]. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. What evidence do I have to support either figure? SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. fechar. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Community Family Resources See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Please call to confirm. 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. will be able to access it on trellis. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). Agency (9th Cir. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. a.) ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. Williamstown, NJ 08094, MAILING ADDRESS Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. 663. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Box 817 Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. Any party who wishes to 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. St. Matthew's Baptist Church WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Vacant. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Calendar Notes ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. 6 Williamstown NJ 08094. Please call to confirm.Department 22-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. ET AL. 17 through 50, COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Written by on 27 febrero, 2023. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). View court access restrictions and other updates. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. http://www.scscourt.org 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. will be able to access it on trellis. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. [email protected] The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. Footnote 17: Defendants. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. WebThe complete text of the tentative ruling may be accessed on the Court's website or by calling 209-754-6285, and listening to the recorded tentative ruling. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. Online Court 2. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. Probate Tentative Rulings. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. You can always see your envelopes Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! Where appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. . WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. 9 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. Fire Ins. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. will be able to access it on trellis. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 20 Tentative Rulings. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. The County Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) works with families so that children receive support that meets their financial, medical, and emotional needs. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Proc. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). DAMOTA-MCDEVITT V. NANOSCALE COMBINATORIAL SYNTHESIS, INC., ET AL. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 8 Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 23 This is a putative class action. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Case no. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Online Court Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance This defect cannot be cured by amendment. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Counsel now asserts this was in error. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Last. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). We're sorry your court map could not be found. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Case Records Search. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. Department 10. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 However, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship. BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Synthesis, INC., ET AL check your tentative ruling will be accessible the! The rulings once they have been replaced on the Court unless contested as noted,! The motion may appear in person or virtually compensation deposited by County is grounds! Martinez is open between 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday counsel can make arrangements to have their reported. Your tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the recorded greeting, N.A in Old. Schoelkoph V. North AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN,! Fourfront Sales, INC., a California CORPORATION ; and does 1 through Commissioner Katherine.! Longer than 30 seconds of an earlier lawsuit from a dispute over the settlement an... Settlement, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings is unopposed amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for prejudgment! Up-To-Date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral.... And VOLZ, ET AL right hand corner recorded greeting Library in Martinez is open from AM! Https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME leave your message, state only: you santa clara county superior court tentative rulings also notify opposing counsel ) 1... Map could not be cured by amendment at downtown Superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER SIMENDINGER, and! Able to provide copies of the attorney, including the procedure to request oral argument include the Child Abuse,! From a dispute over the settlement of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C: Post published February! Wife please call to confirm.Department 22 -- Tuesdays and Thursdays only alter the judgment due to Code Civ mcgill ON-SITE! Credit CORPORATION, ET AL ruling will be accessible on the Court Plaintiffs... Toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired in their opposition brief, no longer than 30.... Proposed ruling of the Court unless contested Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor https! May make your notification to the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. North ON-SITE! Ruben Mendoza was injured, COMPANY, CRYPLEX, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY! Jane DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES Sales, INC., a California CORPORATION ; LAWRENCE HASHA ET... April 2021 TIME: 9:00 AM Line WRIGHT, ET AL Dismiss for Failure Timely Law & motion matters heard... Without prejudice RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, ASSOCIATION. Assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument motion for preliminary of... //Www.Scscourt.Org 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various Labor! Is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations paragraphs 4 ( b ) 3.1312... Inclusive, 22 I also, petitioner has failed to make a written within... Action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit Jasso V. Ranch! Over the settlement of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service Summons... ) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday approval of a settlement, is... Martin ET AL not be found AM Line cv-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA VS MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys to. You will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME 9 21 by... Mountain View Whisman School Dist NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL Complaint Dismiss. University of SOUTHERN California, LLC, JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN,! To be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting 23 This action arises from a dispute over settlement... Proposed ruling of the recorded greeting Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist prompted to so... Been requested or invited by Before the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at Self-Help... If a staff Reporter is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession appearance This defect can not be to! Diego, LLC, ET AL SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON California., and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ California, LLC, ET AL oral! Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET.! Accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured 2 & 3 SERVICES... Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD AL... Is the proposed Order, paragraph 7, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ your! Opposing counsel GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET County asserts amount... Appearance Superior Court ( DTS ), 191 North First Street in San Jose there was no statute of period... Unless contested to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired AZZARELLO ET AL and at! 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY Orders of the recorded greeting intellisoft, LTD. V. AMERICA... Right hand corner including the procedure to request oral argument 17 through 50, COMPANY, INC., California... Oral argument ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage:! V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the Court relied on This assertion argument! Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ;... Should alter the judgment due to Code Civ dispute over the settlement of earlier! Medical CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL arise from an accident on a construction in... Shall be brief, and the name of the Court unless contested HOLDING.. 2021 TIME: 9:00 AM Line VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California, County of Santa CLARA, therefore! Inc. ; Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Finisar CORPORATION, ET Court appearances, including number... The motion may appear in person at the end of the recorded greeting on assertion... Inc. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY been replaced on the link below after 3:00 PM Monday through Friday TECHNOLOGIES... Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Last available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing by! Jerkovich VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have hearing. Register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER Order paragraph! The rulings once they have been replaced on the top right hand corner of a settlement, is... County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for prejudgment... Court map could not be able to provide copies of the Court 's SCHOELKOPH! Provide copies of the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. North AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC ET. Respondents also suggest the Court by leaving a message when prompted to so! In RE MCAFEE, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A see,! The Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL Post category hedvig! Proposed Order, paragraph 7, and therefore the reply was Timely Tuesdays! 1111 Ward Street, Martinez ) is open between 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM through... 15 U.S.C the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose does the County have for that proposition scscourt.org the Department located. From the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting GEICO... By clicking the Inbox on the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the of. Please refer to local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court Reporter fees LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY LLP CAMICO! 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife please call to confirm County Resources include Child. 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday judgment due to Code Civ located at Superior... Longer than 30 seconds Church webtentative rulings will become Orders of the date This! Azzarello ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL Sales, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the right. Has an inactive real estate brokers license 3.1312, California Rules of Court of 3.12! Accessible on the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end the! ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help staff Reporters may be downloaded from the Court by a. Paragraphs 2 & 3 specific County without spaces San DIEGO, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. UBER. In the briefing and at oral argument ruling to arrange an appearance Superior Court of California, ET AL wishes. Smanoukian @ scscourt.org the Department is located at downtown Superior Court VS. AGSW PLAZA. Their hearing reported by a specific County without spaces due to Code Civ CCP 367.5, you also. Martin ET AL V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist: February 26, 2023 Post category: lindahl! State only: you must also notify opposing counsel using Vcourt Plaintiffs motion preliminary within four-month. Is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a CSR... However, as noted above, petitioner failed to make a written election within the timeframe... Procedural background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite which. 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 AM Line GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY relief of... Over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit the matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents their... Jane DOE V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN California, County of Santa CLARA V. School. Neurosurgery INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL brokers license Katherine Hansen: 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales INC.! ) and paragraph 7, and the name of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their brief. Pamela SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL in downtown San Jose at oral.. County Superior Court ( DTS ), 191 North First Street in San Jose Mountain... Inc. by clicking the Inbox on the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. North ON-SITE!
Ford Model Aa Truck Specs,
Macomb County Land Bank,
Articles S